-
Posts
5,061 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9 -
Points
8,995 [ Donate ]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
GoMeanGreen.com
Everything posted by outoftown
-
****OFFICIAL CAL va. UNT IN-GAME DISCUSSION***
outoftown replied to Coach Andy Mac's topic in Mean Green Football
Ott so far winning the game by himself. Other than that the defense has been good. But it has been reaaallly horrible at getting that guy down. -
****OFFICIAL CAL va. UNT IN-GAME DISCUSSION***
outoftown replied to Coach Andy Mac's topic in Mean Green Football
ok. Lets start this game over. its even and UNT has the ball first. -
****OFFICIAL CAL va. UNT IN-GAME DISCUSSION***
outoftown replied to Coach Andy Mac's topic in Mean Green Football
Well... that's better! -
****OFFICIAL CAL va. UNT IN-GAME DISCUSSION***
outoftown replied to Coach Andy Mac's topic in Mean Green Football
first offensive and defensive drives were not exactly .... not exactly (trying to find a good word... not finding anything good about them -
....that....
-
I got to wondering: What kind of "business" offer might that be? They got a hooker problem in North Carolina? I mean if the problem is under-supply SMU has proven it is willing to whore itself out for cheaper than anyone else. If however, the problem lies in oversupply, SMU might have proposed to trade Craig James for an ACC invite straight up.
-
AAC not interested in Oregon State or Washington State.
outoftown replied to Arkstfan's topic in Conference ReAlignment
I didnßt expect this. Espeically not this fast. I get Arrescos logic that those two may not be addititve to the american looked at only by themselves. And it might well turn out that this is the right decision. But I am worried about the opportunity cost of letting the MWC have them. If the CFP stays at 6 champions +6 at larges its not a big deal. But if that number changes to 5+7 (as seems likely), then losing SMU and letting MWC have those two might well create enough of a perception gap between the MWC and AAC that it might become very hard to get teams into the playoffs. If that happens, the AAC stops being the conference from which teams move up. -
I don't think it is a coincidence at all, that these fights always errupt at the beginning of CFB season. Disney is trying to leverage that to get higher prizes because people call in pissed off. Meanwhile what is "fair" is very much in the eye of the beholder. Its not like Spectrum is a nice company either, as anyone who has ever had to try to cancel a service with them through their "customer service" knows (should be called customer incarceration). But I would assume with cord cutting being a very real thing, these cable providers are less and less willing to allow ESPN/Disney to bump up the prizes of their subscription, for fear of losing more folks to the non-cable services. That said, if you look similar stuff also has happened end of august with the streaming providers at times. So -sadly - this kind of stuff will not disapear with the cable providers.
-
I hope SMU stays in the conference. But I am not gonna wear black and be miserable if they do leave. Either way i think UNT is set up to eventually overtake them in the long run.
-
My biggest point from this article: ACC commissioner Phillips was smart enough to use idalia to not have to go to the meeting where people (both journalists and colleagues) would have certainly asked him questions he does not want to answer right now. And when colleagues ask, non-answers are often answers too.
-
Wheeth. Honestly I don't see how they pull any AAC schools unless the ACC thing falls apart for SMU (and maybe also Calford). They could merge with the AAC, but I just don't see them able to raid it. If those three do indeed get into the ACC, then the Pac2 can only get MWC schools. And even about that I would be somewhat skeptical, given that anybody coming in has to pay exit fees in order to join those two schools by themselves with no bigger brands to carry the load.
-
Looks like ACC about to add SMUt Cal and Stanford
outoftown replied to Jonnyeagle's topic in Conference ReAlignment
Yea I saw that. looks like i was misinformed. Still, not a smart move for the conference to go into CFP meetings without having ascertained what their membership outlook actually is. -
Looks like ACC about to add SMUt Cal and Stanford
outoftown replied to Jonnyeagle's topic in Conference ReAlignment
Ok, I think the ACC presidents postponed their meeting to today (couldn't do it yesterday because of the active shooter situation at UNC). With the CFP committee meeting on Wednesday to discuss potential changes, one would think the ACC either decides to add today or otherwise not at all. -
2023 GMG UNT get your rump on the record prediction
outoftown replied to Jonnyeagle's topic in Mean Green Football
6-6. Hope it will be better, but that seems most realistic to me. -
Looks like ACC about to add SMUt Cal and Stanford
outoftown replied to Jonnyeagle's topic in Conference ReAlignment
Have i missed it? has anything happened? Any Official word since the folks started saying this was a "done deal" 6 days ago? Time kills deals. I am starting to think this is more likely to fall apart than to come together. -
No. Without those flagship sports, there is no point for the AAC to add all that travel for the other sports. And vice versa.
-
People here know about Arresco. He's a good commissioner. After years with bad commissioners folks are happy to have that, but some are overestimating what he can do. The MWC made a good hire. Nevarez appears to be pretty good too. This will not be Yormark vs Kliafkoff, this will be a tough fight with the winner not obvious from the start.
-
Looks like ACC about to add SMUt Cal and Stanford
outoftown replied to Jonnyeagle's topic in Conference ReAlignment
Ok, that one is funny, i give you that -
Hmmm... and those spam topics all wanted folks to book flights....hmmm
-
I am all for listing actual weights and heights. Keeps the poachers doubting come transfer portal time. Folks will go: he looks like he can play... but at 5-11 can he really translate to the SEC/Big12? They might still pull the trigger on the really great ones. But it might work every once in a while. Heck, I might even consider taking off an inch and 5 pounds on everyone. Also: much funnier to beat a team when they are supposedly 5 inches taller on average. Once they reach their senior year, you adjust the heights and weights, to an inch above reality, so potential NFLers don't get shafted.
-
The worst part of all of this is this: while fans of the Big12 and B1G teams and of those 8 PAC teams that found a spot may have had a miserable summer, they can now happily focus on actual football. Meanwhile fans of the forgotten four, ACC AAC and MWC are all gonna have a hard time tuning this out completely during what ought to be the happiest time of the year.
-
Looks like ACC about to add SMUt Cal and Stanford
outoftown replied to Jonnyeagle's topic in Conference ReAlignment
I know there are numerous people out the claiming "its a done deal". But I am not sure it is. I give it 50/50 at this point in time. I assume actually that negotiations and arm pulling going on in the background are very hard. Every day that goes by and they do not announce they got the deal done, the chance of it actually happening is going down. Time kills deals as the PAC members already had to experience once this year. It is one thing for SMU to be willing to buy its way into the ACC, but it would be another level of funny to get rejected twice when trying to do so. For the PAC schools time is really of the essence though. If the ACC turns out to be as incapable at taking timely decisions as the PAC10 was, then they might have to move on in a week or two. -
Looks like ACC about to add SMUt Cal and Stanford
outoftown replied to Jonnyeagle's topic in Conference ReAlignment
I truely do wonder: will SMU boosters spend not only to keep their athletics afloat, but actually top that with enough money to thrive. I know everybody believes SMU is rich like that. But I keep having this hunch that the money is not going to be infinite, and that it is quite possible we will see 4-8 SMU teams for a while. And one has to wonder what that will do to engagment. SMU doing this might actually be the way it is most easily to imagine how UNT overtakes them in the medium run. -
Looks like ACC about to add SMUt Cal and Stanford
outoftown replied to Jonnyeagle's topic in Conference ReAlignment
Not really. I don't know how teachers see it, and that may be fairly different from how researcher see it. But as a researcher myself, SMU belongs nowhere near Stanford in any research related conversation. At least not in the fields I have been in. Frankly UNT is ahead of SMU in that regard, as indicated by Tier 1 status. And yet, UNT is also nowhere near Stanfords impact into research. In the maybe 30 international scientific conferences I have been to - spanning a broad variety of life science research (from basic to applied) and different medical and psychology fields - I have yet to see a single presentation (or poster) by anyone from SMU. Stanford you cannot miss if you go to an international conference. UNT you can miss often enough... but at least it hasn't been completely inexistent. -
I get that, but sadly you got to think longer term. The moment when they will dip back into the portal will come in a not too distant future; hopefully not for QB, but certainly for a number of other positions. Players talk to each other. You don't want to become the staff with the reputation of making promises they do not keep. It will make life difficult down the road. Managing emotions of the second string to keep them engaged is more necessary now than it was 5 years ago. p.s. by that I don't mean they should give equal time, just that it is important to manage emotions.