outoftown

Did beat Navy - USF (on the same channel) by almost 100k, 50k behind UCF Arizona State in prime time.

obvious to me that you will have to onside kick if you get a score here.

0 for 3 in the redzone. Can't win with that.

Wow. a punt. offense still not producing. Now watch the defense cratering. Then watch the offense function again. Somehow this offense only works this year when the defense is in dissaray, never takes advantage of when the defense once plays well

Time for the offense to do something to win this game.

For all how bad the defense has looked at times... Army only has seven at the half. For all the risks the offense took (and only the last fourth down was stupid to me), the offense only has three to show for it.

Morris clearly doesn't want the defense on the field much.

First team to take a lead on army.

I have a weirdly good feeling about this one. Time to beat an 8-0 team. Time to beat a ranked opponent

Sometimes i feel like the game would be mighty interesting and much more dynamic, if you had 2 balls. I would then suggest to also allow teams to play 6 players at a time. The strategy would be interesting. just following it would be hard.

Is it a firing if you simply don't renew a contract that runs out?

If Vandy wins today, I am taking vandy.

its been the story of the last two games. Defense often not great. But whenever they DO get a few stops, the offense then goes out and does nothing with that. Can't get momentum like that.

Ok. game over. Maybe season over

what the HECK

This really is not the game to play more than 30% 3-3-5. That plays too much into Tulanes basic game. Still time to adjust. Experience shows you need about 50 points to beat UNT. Tulane is only halfway there.

such a pitty on the PI. Its not truely catachable, not needed to takle him.

How is that not a flag! Since when are you allowed to strangle folks

Im in two minds about that. I get what you are saying and there indeed maybe something to it. but on the other hand I think he is playing "redzone roulette" on defense, i.e. not even trying to hard until the opponent gets to the red zone. If he goes for it there, at least the defense will not be tired and not need to defend the whole field... and if it goes wrong, at least the offense gets the ball back quickly. Its a bold strategy, and it sure didn't work last week, but I can at least halfway see a reasoning for it. Still not sure its the right way to go.

Need to stop running until they lighten that box. Feels like there wasn't a single run with real potential. Also, stop the passes behind the line of scrimmage

I don't like the gimmicky stuff in the E-MOrris offense. If you know what you are doing with gimmicks it can be helpful. But I get the feeling this offense is much more efficient in its basic stuff than with the gimmicks

I think against this Tulane offense the defense can do well... provided the offense gives it the appropriate breaks and time off, because they WILL wear down against this Tulane offense otherwise. This was not a good start in that regard.

was worried after those two runs by their bell cow. He seems haard to bring down. But got a good stop on the first drive

yes, it sucks that 44 points were not enough. But if you have 130 yards more than the opponent and lose by 8, more than just the defense went wrong. Like in-game coaching decisions for example.

It sure is nice when your team wins a conference game that clearly and the only TDs it gives up are garbage time. But don't forget, this is the very same team that lost the first half in Lubbock by a score of 52-7. That was not just a bad dream. It did happen.