As I said earlier, change does not necessarily equal improvement. Sometimes change is just change. If Dickey is fired this year, who in their right mind would take this job? If you want to fire Dickey and improve the program, UNT needs to not only raise the bar by saying just winning the SBC is not enough (something easy to do) but also raise the resources available to a coach to achieve those goals. That means fan support and interest, continued improvement in facilities, better resources for athletes, etc. If you want a new coach, UNT needs to make those potential coaches out there look at the program and say "this program could be so much better". I'll give you two examples of what I am talking about. Nebraska fired Frank Solich after a 9 win season because expectations were that 9 wins were not enough. They struggled to find a replacement for him because firing Solich seemed to make so little sense. Expectations exceeded reality. They wound up with Callahan and failed to even make a bowl last year. My alma mater, Florida, fired Ron Zook last year. All sorts of talking heads said that it was unfair, it was a poor decision. Florida, however, had no trouble attracting a top coach because although expectations are very high (sometimes unreasonably high) but potential coaches could also look at the strengths of the Florida program and say "this program could be so much better". I am not saying UNT needs to become Florida, but if fans would turn out for home gains and better support the program both financially and emotionally, it would be much more reasonable to raise expectations. I have to say, one of the most surprising things to me since I joined the faculty here at UNT is that there seems to be virtually no difference on campus between weeks in which there is a home football game and weeks in which there is no game. It is really hard to see that campus buzz that is so vital in getting students to turn out for games and to get them to want to come back and contribute as alumni.