Quoner

He tweeted this last night:

See...joking, fun, laughs. It's contagious! +1! This is like that windmill day all over again.

Wow, I'm done all around. If you see no common thread between those 3 deaths, there's no point in us going any further. It's a close call, because I'd hate to have fire up Factiva or Nexus and pull every editorial written in the last decade to prove my individual opinion. So...congratulations? P.S.. Can we do a new thread on the right place to stick your person? (/solicits via smiley)

What if I told you the outcome of this going nowhere debate might just impact our projected RPI assuming five Western Kentucky players bring their lunches to the team meeting next week? Interested? You know you are. Aroused? Without question.

Because I post so many? Or because you don't want to argue about the basic premise that our environment is toxic on both sides, but just prove that the side you are not on is really toxic? It's true. I mean, just looking at the 3 most famous assinations in our history (I'll say Lincoln, MLK and JFK). There was by no means any kind of toxic and angry debate around each of those individuals at all. Things were great and then, boom, some nutjob found a gun. I think the exact same thing would be happening in reverse -- that's my issue and it would drive me just as nuts. You must spend a lot of time sticking your penis in people's feet and mouths, because it's impossible for you to find the middle of anything.

My comment meant that I don't usually agree with New York Times editorials. Editorials are written for strong reactions and -- especially now -- meant for page views and sales. As a non-retard, I'm sure you know this. I forget how much I have to spell out and qualify points to avoid your 10 paragraph trap door debates. Let me back up -- the basic idea that I posted at the beginning is that, regardless of what's been going for centuries (did you catch the Lincoln reference I threw out), I think things are at a point today where the environment is so hostile and fractured that it can push the crazies over the edge like never before. The fact that there is one side pointing fingers while the other treats this like a trial defense helps illustrate this. I fail to see why this is a controversial stance, but I can't wait to learn why it is as more and more news sources create the counter-case. Honestly, the reason I bring the sites up is that while they are on their own no big deal, the fact that people have felt the need to go back and scrub and remove things that were inflammatory makes me ask why they were ever up at all. If we're lucky, when all is said and done, maybe a paid study or two will be involved. (/crosses fingers)

So, the editor's a slow Packers fan?

They sure are! My only point is that there is no place for crap like this on either side, but I find it hard to jsut absolve one side for spreading the manure in select places that made this possible. I lean conservative maybe slightly more often than liberal, and was surprised to find myself agreeing with this NYT editorial. We could go back to the days of a board with a nail in it, but then we'll just make bigger boards with bigger nails until we ultimately destroy ourselves.

I'm a little gay for Sleigh Bells right now.

Post as true as time -- ever since Great Granddaddy Kram first posted it in 1865.

If you would just rank individual programs by money and not be so worried about conference affiliation, you could save yourself a lot of posts. The SEC schools with money win -- their whole conference, not so much. Maybe Auburn can bump them back to .500 for the bowl season.

I don't know. Does the article confirm that this is like every other contract extension offered in football in the last 20 years? Who can confirm?

Weird that Palin just took this off her website: http://twitpic.com/3o7pgo I mean, it's just meant in "goo"d fun, right? The valid counterpoint: Sarah Palin didn't shoot Congresswoman Giffords. She was shot "point blank", not from Sarah's "Moose Huntin' Chopper" I'm just saying, maybe we can eliminate the crosshairs gun rhetroic across the table maybe?

Kige Ramsey said he's "hearing rumblings on McDonald." Where there's smoke, there's usually fat kids with digital camcorders and homemade tripods.

I gave you a +1 and then another in her honor for having the courtesy to cut that part out. My parents never do.

I don't see a good way to forward this to 10 friends.

Coming up next...some weird stuff from sports!

English department?

Has their been a sufficient amount of research on wrinkling, folding and how it will be appreciated? If so, who paid for that research?

Yes http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2011/1/5/thoughts-on-beltre-young-guerrero.html

Not ready to hear his name.

WAR sure as hell does, though.

GOOD press doesn't.

First, congrats on having old shoes; that's awesome. Also, my bad -- I did hijack this thread when I started it and asked people to not post stupid rants. BTW, please teach me more about comedy: To be fair, I did notice you posted a few links in September that were pretty relevant and even asked when "basketbal" season started after a Dodge press conference. Please keep it up. Flaaaaaaaming you....is easy 'cause you're beautiful...

I'd love to see what you can do besides get pissed and indignant all the time. Hell, at least the rest of your ilk occasionally posts links.