foutsrouts

You forgot to mention that I called you out for saying: But, I'm 100% fair with my judgments, I assure you! I didn't want you to miss anything in my "NeoNazi agenda. HAHA!! Basically, you're trying to defend yourself for your misstatements, but that's OK because I understand your shortcomings. By the way, aren't you the new kid on the block who came in a few weeks ago, and proclaimed with his first post that: WE ALL NEED TO START GETTING ALONG HERE! NO MORE FIGHTING, NO MORE ARGUING, AND THIS BOARD SHOULD ALL BE ABOUT PEACE AND LOVE AND ALL THINGS GOOD AND WONDERFUL! Well, why have you turned into the most argumentative poster this board has ever seen? You've got problems bud. I'm pretty much done with you, but of course I have the right to slap back if you don't go away.

"3. You keep using AIDS as evidence for why anal sex is unsafe and therefore gay marriage should be illegal, despite the fact that AIDS is not exclusive to the homosexual population, and in fact, has absolutely nothing to do with sex other than the fact that it can be transmitted through it. AIDS isn't even a normal STD, almost every other STD's symptoms occur in the genital region, and can only be transmitted through some kind of contact, whether direct or indirect, with the infected person's genitals. AIDS is a disease spread through bodily fluid contact that shuts down the immune system, it's just pure coincidence that vaginal and penile excretions are some of the bodily fluids that house the virus in an infected person." HA! You're just not very good at this agenda you've attached yourself to now are you! HAHA!

I couldn't care less about your sexuality, but you're clearly an idiot who's obsessed with bringing up your theories on anal sex. I guess your lack of historical education is upsetting to you, and I have no idea how you possibly were admitted to North Texas. You do not have to be intentionally stupid, because it clearly comes natural to you. Truly pathetic.

That's probably true. But the ones who try to keep a thread of their interest going to the top of the list day and night clearly have a cloaked agenda. They're not generally at it for the good of mankind. Well, wrong choice of word there.

You're wrong again. There were laws still prevalent in the 20th century (not 19th) that took away rights of racial groups. Gays are not a racial group by the way, and there were laws against what they practice just a very few short years ago. Enough! I let your obsession drag me in once again. My mistake.

Of course I don't know you, but please don't try and say that you're not gay. I'm not going to look back and read all your voluminous posts on the subject to see if you have acknowledged that previously, but this overwhelming obsession for the defense of gay rights in this thread has gone WAY beyond just a concern for others. Not that I'm bashing your lifestyle of course, but you might as well come clean, because this is much more than too much. Hope it works out well for you and yours.

Did you forget about the 20th century, or is that too far back for you to remember?

Well, there's certainly no doubt that you seem to think that you know it all. Hmmm...are you a documented 20 year old genius with clairvoyant tendencies, or do you have some kind of a vested interest in this issue? Personally, I'm not really into this gay vs. heterosexual game, but you just seem to have a way of dragging people into the fray. Oh well, to each his own. I'm kind of more into things like MEAN GREEN SPORTS. Especially this time of year.

"But, I'm 100% fair with my judgments, I assure you." Simply trying to say that no one is 100% fair with their judgments. That's part of being a human being. I'm not going to go heavily into this, but you keep posting that the legality of gay marriage would have no impact on those who oppose it. Well, I don't think that most opponents would agree with you on that for a variety of reasons. Btw, I'm not a gay basher, and I have no problem at all with civil unions.

If that's possible, then you must have been born in Bethlehem, and I ain't talking Pennsylvania. Oops! I guess I'm not being PC by injecting Christianity into the equation.

Texoma Trophy sounds good. Even if only to piss off those Red River Trophy Mofos.

Very true. I haven't eaten at that place in ten years, because the last chicken sandwich I ate there was very dry and crappy tasting. Now because of all this, I think I'll give them another try out of curiosity. Great marketing campaign no doubt.

I just gotta go get me one of them chicken sandwiches.

Yes, and Doug McDermott from Creighton was a second teamer. If the team does very well and his game really picks up from what he showed last season, then I think he has a definite shot at it. First Team could be tough, but people aren't projecting him as a top 10 pick for nothing.

Medical.

If one fell and nobody was around, would it make a sound?

I guess we can blame TD for Hell and high water, but DT's eligibility status is off limits.

Ditto for Patton. Their crunch time PT could very much hinge on their showing some serious improvement at the line. If not, I expect we'll be seeing a lot of Holmen and Franklin in close games down the stretch. Not saying that's necessarily a bad thing, especially with the way Holmen came on around tourney time.

Most likely 5-6 losses tops.

Tennessee was quite a bit before me, but I'm under the impression that this win was a biggie on campus. Personally, the Baylor blowout was a big one for me. I definitely did enjoy the Oregon State and Cincinnati wins in person btw.

And Randy Travis.

Ridiculous. Armadillos aren't exactly unique to their region. If they really have to change it, they might as well call themselves the TSU-SM Bats. At least they do have a baseball team.

You're right. I had a small tear and didn't take proper care and rest after the injury. It took three or four years before the discomfort finally disappeared 100%. It's not something you want to rush. Especially as a DL going against guys who outweigh you by 50 or more pounds.

Nice. Team chemistry is crucial with the top to bottom talent that this team has. Hope this guy can provide an assist in keeping the prize at the end of the rainbow as the primary objective here. Especially this season when the competition for minutes is likely to be great.

Sure, speculation is fun, but trying to rank this team at this point is a bit difficult unless you're very much an insider. The only thing I'll say, is that Holmen, Alzee, and JW will find their minutes IMO. They're all solid at the line, and they all showed some serious stuff at times last year. Certainly the two veterans. As far as Niko is concerned, his leg strength seems to be a liability, but I suspect his length and other attributes will get him some minutes. It will be fun watching the coaching staff figure all this out. Most of us have been used to JJ's style for many years, so there could be a bunch of surprises out in front of us.