Eagle1855

has or should? Either way, I fully support it. Viva El Flan.

I read an article about it in Fast Company last year... that's their plan. Unveil the high end sports cars showing it is a viable form of transportation and energy, generate interest (ergo demand) in the general public, then start producing other more-affordable lines.

well it's a "non-UNT sport", so it's fair game. And honestly, it's about as interesting to me as SWT's potential move to Div 1A.

wow, someone somehow managed to steer this thing back on topic. Kudos. Regarding Tesla, those things are awesome! Im all for it. Problem is, a lot of people make a lot of money with oil. And Im guessing there are several countries in a certain part of the world that stand to lose a great deal of income if we find alternative methods to power our vehicles. I mean, I don't really care. I just wonder how it all shakes out.

Yeah, and if we can score like 62 points a game, we'll never lose. Err.....

I was thinking more syfalus. tomato/salmon

didn't need 20 pages to figure THAT out. let's talk about melt downs. Which do you like better, Casey Kasem or

fixed. no? WE'LL DO IT LIVE!

very nicely done.

stop being such a QUEER!* *i hope you get that joke. if not, Im sorry. know that it was only a joke to make a point. what that point was is now long gone. like my sense of decorum during sunday funday yesterday. 5 o'clock cant get here soon enough.

i think we can all agree that animals are merely here for our amusement and this is not that big of a deal.

Let's be real, can't everyone's problems be attributed to the Jews?* *tongue THRU cheek...

well that and never beating FAU...

yes indeed. hmmmm Well, at any rate, Kobe's taste in indiscretions is fairly suspect (and his methods of wooing come across as awkward- as if they are being 'forced') but he IS a hell of a basketball player so I'll give him a free pass on this one.

mine too. effin brilliant. I guess that says a little bit about the kind of person I am. Seriously, Kobe never lets up. That's what makes him a great competitor. Wait, Im not sure that relates to this story... or does it? Find out after the break.

So you think that having (hiring) people to go out and kill them all would cost LESS money than the few cases a year where people are attacked? I just can't see that being the case. Not to mention the backlash that will undoubtedly come from the animal-loving public. And just because a city has made it illegal doesn't prove that your suggestion is "right". Im not really sure Im interested in the govt legislating more of what I can and can't do. And what kind of "drop" in maulings are we talking about? Im just curious. I'd like to know the numbers. Obviously if we killed all of the bears in North America, we wouldn't have to worry about those bastards either. Though Im not sure that would be the "responsible" thing to do.

Is that like a really annoyed state of confusion? not agreeing with something someone does makes them un-American. It's simple, really. Duh.

ahh, he's just being rebellion. give him a break...

Not a Rick Roll, holmes. Just some good old-fashioned, crotch-kicking 80s metal-tronica. You don't have to watch it. But I'll tell you your life will be better for it. Mine is.

Did you ever know that you're my hero, and everything I would like to be? I can fly higher than an eagle, 'cause you are the wind beneath my wings.

I wish the stadium could be built out sunshine and unicorn farts. Hell, I'd settle for rainbows and fields of daisies. Anyone notice how every thread somehow ends up back at the same discussion/digression? All we need is some global warming/gas price banter with a few sprinklings of pit bull victims and we can pretty much shut the rest of this site down! Oh, and it also needs THIS. God that song pumps me up.

Interesting. My former HS uses K-State's logos as well. Some 7 TD's and an impressive hurdling later, my HS is now best-known for being Sam McGuffie's bitch.

Like...? Methinks all that property will continue to appreciate. Sitting on it isnt hurting anything. It may actually be wise. If the University does continue to grow, they've got land they purchased for far less than what they would have spent to aquire it 20-30 years from now.

Once again the reading (in)comprehension bug attacks the gomeangreen board. I keep repeating things because you keep attacking an argument that I haven't even presented. Again, I said PEOPLE WHO CHOOSE to OWN THE DOGS should be held LIABLE for anything their pets do- whether the dog was provoked or not. People should also have to have a license to breed them. If people are stupid enough to keep a dangerous breed of ANY animal around a child, they deserve whatever punishment the law deems appropriate. It should, however, be their decision and it doesn't require the eradication of an entire species of an animal because of our stupidity. Which is why I said people should be held accountable for their actions. That was never meant to be understood as their actions relating to the provocation of a dog. Again, you're focusing heavily on the things right in front of you as opposed to the big picture and the implications such a charge has on future problems with the interaction between animals and humans. I can appreciate what you do. Actually, I really can't... the things you've done and seen are beyond my comprehension and my realm of experience. But that doesn't make my opinion on what is socially responsible any less valid.