MeanGreen61

If we did, you'd certainly remind us.

ECU -2 @ Middle Tennessee Tulsa -7 v Rice Marshall -12 v UTSA Tulane -2 v North Texas UAB -6 v FAU USM -7 v FIU ALL PICKS http://www.jhowell.net/cf/cfpred.txt

Louisiana Tech Rivals site's weekly conference power rankings. http://louisianatech.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1553305

Another site, Massey Composite, predicting a UTSA win over Rice. http://www.masseyratings.com/team.php?t=6535&s=199231

Yep, one game at a time but........ Closest game to be with UTSA. http://knology.net/~brucepayne/teams/NORTH%20TEXAS.htm

Tulane is AT ULM. We are AT Tulane.

!. ECU 2. Marshall 3. Middle Tennessee 4. Rice 5. North Texas 6. UTSA 7. Tulsa 8. Tulane 9. UTEP T10. UAB T10. FAU 12. Louisiana Tech 13. USM 14. FIU

NT 5 point favorite.

Posted by BleedGreen33 on the CUSA board. Here is how each team ranks in each statistical category tracked by NCAA.com. These rank from 1-123. UTSA is not included in the rankings this season. I am only ranking current CUSA Members. Offensive 3rd Down Conversion 1) UTEP #31 2) ECU #32 3) MTSU #33 4) Marshall #34 5) FAU #58 6) North Texas #63 7) Tulane #75 8) Tulsa #88 9) Rice #89 10) LaTech #99 11) UAB #112 12) S.Miss #114 13) FIU #122 4th Down Conversion 1) ECU #4 2) UAB #42 3) North Texas #46 4) Marshall #47 5) Tulane #51 6) FIU #54 7) FAU #55 8) Rice #81 9) UTEP #82 10) Tulsa #88 11) MTSU #96 12) LaTech #115 13) S.Miss #121 1st Downs 1) Marshall #5 2) MTSU #17 3) North Texas #40 4) LaTech #63 5) FAU #65 6) Rice #78 7) Tulane #81 8) UTEP #88 9) ECU #104 10) UAB #105 11) Tulsa #111 12) S.Miss #117 13) FIU #122 Fumbles Lost 1) Rice #16 2) UTEP #22 3) UAB #35 4) ECU #45 5) MTSU #51 6) North Texas #96 7) Tulsa #99 8) FIU #105 9) S.Miss #108 10) Marshall #109 11) FAU #111 12) Tulane #115 13) LaTech #121 Interceptions Thrown 1) UAB #24 2) UTEP #28 3) LaTech #35 4) Tulsa #41 5) FIU #51 6) Tulane #57 7) ECU #65 8) North Texas #82 9) Marshall #99 10) FAU #100 11) Rice #104 12) MTSU #112 13) S.Miss #119 Passing 1) Marshall #27 2) North Texas #33 3) ECU #39 4) S.Miss #53 5) Tulane #66 6) UAB #67 7) Rice #70 8) Tulsa #72 9) MTSU #86 10) LaTech #88 11) FAU #101 12) UTEP #107 13) FIU #120 Passing Efficiency 1) ECU #32 2) UAB #49 3) North Texas #53 4) Marshall #63 5) Tulane #77 6) UTEP #85 7) MTSU #91 8) Tulsa #101 9) FIU #104 10) LaTech #105 11) Rice #106 12) FAU #107 13) S.Miss #115 Passing Yards Per Completion 1) UAB #8 2) Marshall #53 3) Tulane #69 4) Rice #72 5) Tulsa #78 6) S.Miss #87 7) North Texas #93 8) MTSU #98 9) UTEP #110 10) ECU #111 11) FIU #116 12) LaTech #118 13) FAU #121 Red Zone Offense 1) Rice #2 2) ECU #26 3) Marshall #45 4) UAB #47 5) Tulane #50 6) UTEP #68 7) North Texas #77 8) Tulsa #89 9) LaTech #102 10) FAU #106 11) FIU #107 12) MTSU #110 13) S.Miss #120 Rushing 1) UTEP #32 2) Rice #33 3) MTSU #46 4) Marshall #54 5) LaTech #70 6) UAB #71 7) FAU #87 8) North Texas #89 9) Tulsa #95 10) Tulane #101 11) S.Miss #117 12) ECU #118 13) FIU #123 Sacks Allowed 1) Tulsa #28 2) North Texas #31 3) UTEP #64 4) UAB #75 5) Marshall #91 6) MTSU #92 7) S.Miss #94 8) Rice #98 9) LaTech #100 10) Tulane #113 11) FIU #115 12) ECU #117 13) FAU #119 Scoring Offense 1) Marshall #29 2) UAB #55 3) ECU #63 4) MTSU #64 5) UTEP #67 6) North Texas #69 7) Tulane #71 8) Rice #76 9) FAU #96 10) Tulsa #103 11) LaTech #111 12) S.Miss #120 13) FIU #123 T.O.P. 1) Rice #6 2) UTEP #32 3) North Texas #36 4) FAU #40 5) Tulane #44 6) MTSU #62 7) UAB #63 8) FIU #82 9) Marshall #97 10) ECU #108 11) S.Miss #113 12) LaTech #115 13) Tulsa #117 Tackles For Loss Allowed 1) UTEP #19 2) UAB #30 3) Tulsa #31 4) MTSU #80 5) S.Miss #85 6) ECU #86 7) FAU #106 8) Marshall #107 9) Rice #108 10) Tulane #116 11) North Texas #117 12) LaTech #121 13) FIU #122 Total Offense 1) Marshall #28 2) Rice #53 3) MTSU #61 4) North Texas #63 5) UAB #68 6) UTEP #74 7) LaTech #83 8) Tulane #100 9) Tulsa #105 10) ECU #109 11) FAU #111 12) S.Miss #112 13) FIU #122 Turnovers Lost 1) UTEP #16 2) UAB #25 3) ECU #61 4) FIU #70 5) Rice #76 6) Tulsa #79 7) Tulane #97 8) North Texas #100 9) MTSU #101 10) LaTech #103 11) Marshall #105 12) FAU #111 13) S.Miss #122 Defensive 3rd Down Conversion 1) Marshall #23 2) UTEP #42 3) Rice #54 4) FAU #56 5) Tulane #62 6) LaTech #69 7) Tulsa #80 8) FIU #85 9) North Texas #89 10) UAB #93 11) S.Miss #95 12) ECU #107 13) MTSU #109 4th Down Conversion 1) North Texas #14 2) LaTech #30 3) ECU #42 4) FAU #49 5) FIU #61 6) Marshall #65 7) Rice #71 8) Tulane #81 9) UAB #89 10) MTSU #90 11) UTEP #91 12) Tulsa #122 13) S.Miss #123 1st Down Defense 1) Rice #36 2) Tulsa #38 3) UTEP #39 4) ECU #40 5) S.Miss #42 6) Marshall #58 7) UAB #64 8) FAU #76 9) North Texas #82 10) FIU #91 11) Tulane #94 12) LaTech #97 13) MTSU #109 Fumbles Recoverd 1) North Texas #1 2) UAB #15 3) FAU #19 4) LaTech #20 5) MTSU #25 6) Tulane #35 7) Marshall #54 8) UTEP #62 9) ECU #75 10) FIU #77 11) S.Miss #90 12) Rice #109 13) Tulsa #115 Pass Efficiency Defense 1) Marshall #26 2) Tulane #48 3) FAU #49 4) LaTech #57 5) ECU #60 6) Tulsa #69 7) MTSU #78 8) S.Miss #84 9) Rice #87 10) North Texas #108 11) UAB #117 12) UTEP #119 13) FIU #123 Passes Intercepted 1) Tulane #8 2) MTSU #9 3) Marshall #14 4) North Texas #29 5) LaTech #33 6) FAU #43 7) Rice #69 8) Tulsa #72 9) ECU #86 10) UTEP #89 11) S.Miss #102 12) FIU #104 13) UAB #108 Passing Yards Allowed 1) S.Miss #4 2) FAU #23 3) Marshall #32 4) UTEP #44 5) FIU #53 6) Tulane #64 7) Tulsa #65 8) Ruce #88 9) UAB #94 10) ECU #95 11) LaTech #99 12) MTSU #104 13) North Texas #116 Red Zone Defense 1) ECU #13 2) North Texas #25 3) FAU #47 4) LaTech #48 5) Marshall #49 6) MTSU #55 7) UTEP #58 8) Tulane #75 9) UAB #101 10) FIU #109 11) Rice #118 12) S.Miss #120 13) Tulsa #122 Rushing Defense 1) ECU #10 2) Marshall #17 3) LaTech #49 4) Tulane #57 5) MTSU #61 6) Rice #63 7) UAB #66 8) North Texas #78 9) Tulsa #96 10) S.Miss #98 11) FAU #107 12) UTEP #109 13) FIU #112 Sacks 1) ECU #11 2) MTSU #14 3) LaTech #15 4) Marshall #20 5) Rice #51 6) FAU #71 7) FIU #86 8) Tulane #88 9) Tulsa #96 10) North Texas #99 11) UAB #110 12) S.Miss #121 13) UTEP #122 Scoring Defense 1) Marshall #35 2) ECU #53 3) LaTech #55 4) North Texas #70 5) MTSU #82 6) Tulane #83 7) FAU #84 8) UTEP #92 9) Rice #94 10) S.Miss #102 11) Tulsa #111 12) UAB #116 13) FIU #122 Tackles For Loss 1) LaTech #12 2) Marshall #19 3) Tulane #34 4) Tulsa #51 5) FIU #56 6) MTSU #61 7) ECU #69 8) S.Miss #83 9) UAB #84 10) Rice #85 11) FAU #96 12) North Texas #116 13) UTEP #122 Total Defense 1) Marshall #16 2) S.Miss #38 3) ECU #43 4) Tulane #62 5) FAU #71 6) LaTech #78 7) Rice #80 8) UTEP #86 9) Tulsa #88 10) UAB #90 11) MTSU #94 12) FIU #101 13) North Texas #112 Turnovers Gained 1) North Texas #1 2) Tulane #5 3) MTSU #7 4) LaTech #19 5) Marshall #20 6) FAU #38 7) UAB #72 8) ECU #77 9) UTEP #89 10) Rice #104 11) Tulsa #107 12) FIU #111 13) S.Miss #117

Rumors are rampant. Saw on another board that the Big 5 may take 2 other conferences with them if the change is made. CUSA & MWC ? Who knows ?

http://espn.go.com/college-sports/story/_/id/9713684/ncaa-president-mark-emmert-says-lot-change-coming-ncaa

Yesterday's hero, today's....................... http://www.latechbbb.com/forum/showthread.php?122632-Go-on-record-now

1. Texas A&M Aggies 2. Baylor Bears 3. Texas Tech Red Raiders 4. TCU Horned Frogs 5. Houston Cougars 6. Texas Longhorns 7. Rice Owls Greg Tepper: A stumble at the hands of rival Houston stings, but now's not the time to take an eye off the prize -- a championship of the very winnable Conference USA. 8. North Texas Mean Green Greg Tepper: Yes, it was in a losing effort, but perhaps no team in Texas impressed as much as the Mean Green this week, putting a scare into Top 10 Georgia on the road. Dan McCarney has us believing in the Mean Green. 9. UTSA Roadrunners Brad Hilliard: The Roadrunners' tough non-conference slate will serve them well as they venture into a deeper-than-you-might-suspect C-USA schedule. 10. SMU Mustangs 11. Texas State Bobcats 12. UTEP Miners Adam Hochfelder: Losing badly at home to UTSA can be summed up in one word: ouch! http://www.texasfootball.com/college-news/view/180533

Try some multi-tasking.

CFN, which usually ranks North Texas somewhere behind the Molly Jones school for Girls and Purgatory University, is finally giving NT a decent ranking. http://cfn.scout.com/2/1329068.html

Another site predicting that the Mean Green will play in Dallas. North Texas vs Minnesota. http://cfn.scout.com/2/557866.html

College Football Poll has North Texas at #78. This site has predicted 46 of 50 CUSA games correctly and is very accurate on predicting North Texas. Has the Mean Green with a 9-3 season. http://www.collegefootballpoll.com/current_congrove_rankings.html

This team not only believes they can win, they believes they WILL win.

http://espn.go.com/college-football/bowls/projections

Plus 1 . Good post. Looking for good things to build on is much better than just looking stuff to bitch about.

From a USA Today article. Georgia outgained North Texas by a staggering margin in total yards, 641-245, the fourth-most in school history. But the Bulldogs didn't put it away until the fourth quarter.

Blah,blah...Believe that you are the ONLY POSTER who has not one good or positive thing to say about the team. Concentrating on negatives is one thing, but that seems to be all that you ever do.

Another infomercial from WESUCK.COM (no surprise, you know it's coming)

1,2,3,4,5.......didn't take long !

Great post !