meanrob

Yeah, a quote from Byron on the board of regents doesn’t mean anything. He doesn’t even say they are tied. You yourself said they can get out of it. Oooooh, enticing? That’s how they’ll sell it to the tv executives. The PAC champ isn’t ensured of anything. Complete nonsense. How many of these journalist predicted this whole PAC revival? I don’t need anything, I’m not an SMU douche predicting to know it all on another schools board. It’s all Green and it’s all good.

Show me one verified source that UNLV and Nevada are tied together. Show me one source that says what the PAC tv deal will be. You already said the PAC would rebuild into a power conference. Never happening. Show me anything. You’re just spouting your own BS and tweet rumors.

June Jones was 36-43 at SMU, glad you consider that a success. Chad Morris was 7-19. But hey, bowl games. You bought your way into the ACC, and I don’t care that you did. That route isn’t plausible for UNT. So why don’t you stop acting like you know what’s best for North Texas. You can be full of bullshit about this because none of it pertains to you.

Depending on the teams, probably less than we are getting now. What do you think the PAC looks like after they burn through that money and OSU and WSU are full on G5 teams? Ever been to Pullman or Corvallis when they play a non name team? Tell me what the difference is between 8-4 in either conference? I’ll tell you, zero. Both go to lower bowl games. If they make a deal we can’t refuse, so be it. Otherwise it’s a short-sighted option. You guys moved “up” in conferences several times and it didn’t do shit for you. Did nothing for attendance or tv, you were a .500 at best program. Sonny Dykes changed your fortunes, not moving conferences.

So someone is going to pony up 10+ million per team to stream a late night UTSA vs Fresno State game. I’ll believe it when I see it and after I read the small print.

You don’t get more defensive talent you could have Buddy Ryan coaching the defense and it wouldn’t matter much. Still the fault of the staff but I don’t see a quick fix.

The streaming services low-balled the original PAC 12, you think they're going to throw money at this version of it?

I live on the west coast. I watched it all the time. This ain’t USC vs Utah.

Being the best non P4 conference gets you nothing. Doesn’t get you the playoff spot, doesn’t get you a seat at any table and doesn’t get you any closer to the big boy conferences. Especially if/when there is a separation. It’s why you gave up years of revenue to get out of the non P4. I’d listen to what the new PAC has to say but it’s basically a version of the MWC. SDSU hosted Oregon State this past week. The game didn’t come close to selling out and nobody east of Nevada saw it. Not sure us playing Fresno St at 9:30 central on Apple is the way to go.

If I'm the eastern schools you better have a damn good idea of how much you can get in a media deal. The numbers thrown around in some of these tweets/reports are ridiculous. My guess is they try really hard to get money from a streaming service but then nobody sees your games. The MWC adding the two PAC schools didn't bring any value, I don't know why it suddenly has value going the other way.

Not sure where this goes, you would think they would add six. This will still be a G5 conference no matter who they add so I wonder if any AAC teams see any appeal to joining. With the amount of money coming in, I wonder who the MWC goes after. We have to be on the potential list.

Better wear the whole uniform if you’re bringing back the helmet.

They stop the clock for first downs in the last two mins of each half.

I hate to tell you this but a lot of teams go through BS every week. Including multiple top ten teams. We play to our potential and the next two games are winnable.

You’re not very good at this. 2-0