eulesseagle

I wish RD the best of luck at McNeese. That is one tough human being.

I went with 6-6 after seeing how the team responded to Coach Canales last year. I think they will respond better this year and get a few breaks our way. This is the most experienced staff that I have seen at NT and with a couple of coaches with NFL experience this will definitely help.

http://www.dallasnews.com/sports/college-sports/unt-mean-green/20110717-poll-how-will-the-unt-mean-green-fare-in-2011-let-your-voice-be-heard.ece vote and view your results.

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,774666,00.html The German's agree with you.....in Der Spiegel However, in General Von Seeckt's book (1930)"The Future of the German Empire", he would fight against Keynesian economics in favor of economic cuts across the board.

http://dallasnews.stats.com/cfb/teamstats.asp?yr=2011&report=roster&team=0182 go ahead a waste a day....it's friday.

And now the gun running involves not only Mexican gangs but also Central American gangs including MS-13....this article has some interesting documentation that you can directly link..... http://www.infowars.com/operation-castaway-guns-trafficked-to-honduran-criminal-gangs/

http://collegesportsblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2011/07/dan-mccarney-north-texas-has-the-pieces.html

you should read the references to all the articles .... investigate its content on the "net" or the library .... decide for yourself. I really do not see anything in the article that has not been reported by all the media outlets from the left to the right...but then again i am not like those two geico guys who live under a rock.

you are absolutely correct and here are more documented examples that the spending is out of control: http://www.infowars.com/obama-is-establishing-an-executive-dictatorship/

totally agree....and now government wants us to "voluntariy dontate" to the national debt: this is from the government web site: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:h2411:

great piece by Paul Harvey http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474977047507

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-03/republicans-may-accept-mini-debt-ceiling-deal-cornyn-says.html this is what they campaigned against...... about a week and a half ago (or so) a majority of republicans and democrats voted to condem the American involvement of the bombing campaign in Libia. Some elected leaders spoke as if they were at the Alamo and drawing a line in the sand. Then they went back and voted to fund the bombing campaign....almost en mass. I am reminded of John Kerry's famous statement of I voted against it before I vote for it. .... or maybe it was the other way around. As I have stated in the past there is not a nickel's worth of difference between the Republicans and Democrats. Every 2-4-6 years we vote to see who is going to engineer the train. At one time I believed that the two separate parties were on separate trains going in the same direction but at different speeds. Since Bush #1 and going forward I have been convinced that both parties are on the same train. Take off your blinders, be objective,and look the information up on the computer.

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/story/15260232

always personal attacks....you should use some of your energy to humble yourself to look up the information. the difference between you and posters like Silver Eagle, Screaming Eagle and EulessIsMore is that they engage in intellectual conversation and no personal attacks on members and their families. You, CBL, have a history of attacking the person instead of the post.....we call it "Intellectual Bankruptcy." I would much rather sit down and have burgers and beer with Silver, Screamin', and Euless knowing that the conversation would be civil than someone like you who would degerate into personal attacks when they discover that they are wrong. Perhaps one day you will learn that lesson.

instead of making personal attacks on myself and my family you should be looking up this "basic information".....in your area of study.....

meaning no disrespect but your lack of information on the subject does not mean it did not happen......you have a computer....type in some key words and look it up.

i am correct again....but....like always you do not want to admit that you are incorrect in your facts.......look it up on the computer.....my son learned the info in high school.

there is no, what you call bullshit, in any of the statements you disagree with. if you have problems with any of the statements then you need to take some time and look it up because i have. Besides this is "very" basic information and common knowledge.

You do make valid points on the issue. I would like to add that it was the Congress that was a northern majority that was, essentially, making almost exclusively, shipping ports in the north where all foreign goods were to be shipped and received leaving the south without a legitimate port to enhance any foreign trade. This forced the south to transport a majority of their goods to northern cities. The congress passed tax laws that were unfavorable to the south. The average southerner was having to pay at least two to three times as much in taxes as their norther counter part. Congress made it almost impossible for the south to build manufacturing plants to produce goods made from cotton...ect.....by the time the war began the south, i believe, only had a handful of plants to make cannon and arms. The United States was the only place in the western hemispher where slaves were able to procreate. By the time that slavery was prohibited in the U.S. there were approximately 400k (or so slaves) & mostly in the south, naturally, even though they were in all the other states and territories. By the time the war began the number grew to over 2 million. Strangely enough the worst of the slave owners were themselves black freemen who were once themselves slaves. Most of these slave owners were in Louisiana and Mississippi. I would like to add that the cost of a slave to a regular owner would almost equate to a year's wages of an average white man. To me it would be hard to justify abuse of such property. CBL is correct in stating that most plantations had schools and churchs errected to the education of their slaves. Even though this was against the law the south did turn their head the other way, en mass, and I do not ever recall, in my readings, that anyone was ever prosecuted for this act. Essentially, the U.S. Congress forced the south into an agrarian state and forced the south to transport those goods north for sale and export. Southerners were overtaxed by a northern majority that felt that the populace down south were hicks and were there for their own financial gains. One only has to research northern archives to get the true feelings of the north against the south. The north did want to send a militia force through Virginia and North Carolina to collect back taxes of South Carolina on two occasions in the mid to late '50s and Virginia and N.C. told the north that they were not marching through our states to get to South Carolina. The north backed down both times.

ok, i will match your entertainment with entertainment.....uncle tom's cabin.

let silver eagle prove his first statement before the second one is responded to.

perhaps you can give a couple of examples when the vanquished was able to revise history in their favor....or maybe some other time.

http://scv.org/ for those who want to join here is the website.....easy to find with "the net." only through the study of history does one understand revisionism. for those who want to believe revisonism they will be forever lost in the abyss of lies. i had a great great grandfather who was a doctor for the south who served in missouri and arkansas. on my father's side they fought with the south in both battles of pea ridge.

I am not referencing politifac....I am referencing three papers including the Boise, Idaho paper.

perhaps all three papers, including the Idaho Statesman (Boise), got all the information from politifac. I doubt it but belive what you want.